<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marlins payroll expectations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marlinmaniac.com/2009/11/09/marlins-payroll-expectations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marlinmaniac.com/2009/11/09/marlins-payroll-expectations/</link>
	<description>A Miami Marlins Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:02:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Jong</title>
		<link>http://marlinmaniac.com/2009/11/09/marlins-payroll-expectations/comment-page-1/#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Jong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marlinmaniac.com/?p=1137#comment-422</guid>
		<description>Moti,

Thanks for the kind words Moti, and spread the word around to any of your fellow Marlins fans.

Check out the new post regarding the stuff seen on MLBTR as well. Enjoy, I hope to keep working on bringing insightful analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moti,</p>
<p>Thanks for the kind words Moti, and spread the word around to any of your fellow Marlins fans.</p>
<p>Check out the new post regarding the stuff seen on MLBTR as well. Enjoy, I hope to keep working on bringing insightful analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moti</title>
		<link>http://marlinmaniac.com/2009/11/09/marlins-payroll-expectations/comment-page-1/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>Moti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marlinmaniac.com/?p=1137#comment-421</guid>
		<description>Thanks alot for the answer man.I just saw you comment on mlbtraderumors regarding Uggs,great points.I love blog,can&#039;t get enough.Keep it up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks alot for the answer man.I just saw you comment on mlbtraderumors regarding Uggs,great points.I love blog,can&#8217;t get enough.Keep it up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Jong</title>
		<link>http://marlinmaniac.com/2009/11/09/marlins-payroll-expectations/comment-page-1/#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Jong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marlinmaniac.com/?p=1137#comment-420</guid>
		<description>Moti,

First off, welcome to the comments section on Marlin Maniac? Now, to the question.

I do think the Marlins can get a player who is close to major league ready, especially for Uggla. A straight one-for-one for Cantu would probably also net a major leaguer; last year, they were talking about Cantu-for-Jonathan Sanchez in San Francisco, and something like that could still be in the cards for the Marlins.

Then again, the Marlins are always looking for organizational depth, and pitching is a huge need in the organization at the moment. So the chances of a 2-3 propsect package that includes guys who are at least a year away are also large.

I&#039;d say for Uggla, we could get a package that involves at least one player ready for the bigs, and I think the team would like that, along with some prospect lottery tickets. What position that player would play is a different story entirely, and all we can do is wait and see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moti,</p>
<p>First off, welcome to the comments section on Marlin Maniac? Now, to the question.</p>
<p>I do think the Marlins can get a player who is close to major league ready, especially for Uggla. A straight one-for-one for Cantu would probably also net a major leaguer; last year, they were talking about Cantu-for-Jonathan Sanchez in San Francisco, and something like that could still be in the cards for the Marlins.</p>
<p>Then again, the Marlins are always looking for organizational depth, and pitching is a huge need in the organization at the moment. So the chances of a 2-3 propsect package that includes guys who are at least a year away are also large.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say for Uggla, we could get a package that involves at least one player ready for the bigs, and I think the team would like that, along with some prospect lottery tickets. What position that player would play is a different story entirely, and all we can do is wait and see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moti</title>
		<link>http://marlinmaniac.com/2009/11/09/marlins-payroll-expectations/comment-page-1/#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>Moti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marlinmaniac.com/?p=1137#comment-418</guid>
		<description>Do you see us getting major-league ready players for Uggla and Cantu? I don&#039;t want prospects who wont contribute right away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you see us getting major-league ready players for Uggla and Cantu? I don&#8217;t want prospects who wont contribute right away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Jong</title>
		<link>http://marlinmaniac.com/2009/11/09/marlins-payroll-expectations/comment-page-1/#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Jong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marlinmaniac.com/?p=1137#comment-416</guid>
		<description>Lane,

I wouldn&#039;t mind using Hinske as a platoon partner in the outfield and have him fill in at first base as well. If we started him, he would not be bad though, maybe a bit worse than Cantu. Not the greatest contribution, but it&#039;s good on the cheap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lane,</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t mind using Hinske as a platoon partner in the outfield and have him fill in at first base as well. If we started him, he would not be bad though, maybe a bit worse than Cantu. Not the greatest contribution, but it&#8217;s good on the cheap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

