Revisiting a four-year deal for Uggla

Sports Illustrated’s Jon Heyman tweeted today that the Marlins have shifted to a four-year deal for second baseman Dan Uggla. The only money-related detail we got from the tweet was that the deal would start at $8M for 2011. We can obviously expect seasonal increases in salary from there.

Since the Marlins just supposedly offered a presumably more reasonable deal, I think this is  as good a time as any to revisit the contract crowdsourcing we did here at Marlin Maniac for Uggla’s next deal with the Fish. Let’s take a look at what 27 Marlins fans thought the Marlins were going to give Uggla.

Average years: 3.41 years
Average AAV: $10.41M

Median years: 3 years
Median AAV: $10M

Standard Dev years: 0.89 years
Standard Dev AAV: $2M

Does a deal like this make sense for the Marlins? If we take the average AAV along with the median of three years, we would get a contract of about 3 years/$31.2M. This is actually very close to my preferred realistic deal of 3-year/$33M. The readers here were split between three and four seasons, and since the Marlins are apparently offering four years, a deal at this given AAV would look like a 4-year/$41.6M offer that again runs pretty close to what we would expect.

The Fish are apparently offering just $8M for the 2011 season, so let’s see how a four-year offer for $41.6M could break down.

2011: $8M
2012: $11M
2013: $11M
2014: $12M

That breakdown adds up to $42M over the life of the deal. If the Marlins were planning on offering Uggla around the annual value voted here by the fans, this breakdown would be a pretty fair one. Uggla would receive essentially the same salary as in 2010 and get about a 50% pay raise from that 2011 salary for the remaining three years.

The question now is whether Uggla would accept such an offer, and I feel that he might hold off for a bit more. He is one season away from free agency, and if he and his camp honestly feel that they could be set to earn somewhere along the lines of $15M annually (the approximate value of his 2012 season if he were a decent defender), then they should and would hold off for more money. The truth, however, is that Uggla probably wouldn’t get a whole lot more than $11M annually in the market because, even if he feels he is still decent on defense, no one in the league believes him. If the Marlins offer something like 4-years/$44M, I doubt he would pass on the offer. From there, Marlins fans would have to hope that his defense doesn’t fall apart entirely by age 33.

Next Marlins Game View full schedule »
Tuesday, Sep 2323 Sep7:10Philadelphia PhilliesBuy Tickets

Tags: Dan Uggla Miami Marlins

comments powered by Disqus